+1 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 with the provisions mentioned by Sergiu. > > However I’m not entirely confident about our HTML5/XHTML validation tools. > Specifically, I’m not 100% convinced that they find all validation issues but > I don’t know those tools well so I could be wrong. I do know that we exclude > some vms for various reasons. Thus putting clean=false could increase the > possibility of having non XHTML/HTML5-valid output without noticing it. > > The good part is that on the long run it should allow us to fix > non-XHTML/HTML5-valid code instead of having it fixed by the HTML Cleaner. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> On 15 Jul 2016, at 16:13, Marius Dumitru Florea >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi devs, >> >> I'd like to propose that we use, from now on, {{html clean="false"}} when >> developing applications, because: >> >> * HTML cleaning is an extra step that can increase page loading time >> * the HTML cleaner can have bugs (like any other code) or unexpected >> behaviour (like removing some elements or some attributes when you don't >> expect it) >> * when I make a mistake in my HTML code I'd like to detect it as soon as >> possible, instead of letting the cleaner silently "fix" it for me. Note >> that we would still have the webstandards validation tests as a safety net >> (only for the default distribution though) >> >> We should keep clean=true by default because we don't want the XWiki users >> to break the XWiki UI too easily when they copy some HTML from the web and >> paste it inside the HTML macro. >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> WDYT? >> >> Thanks, >> Marius > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
