> On 11 Jul 2017, at 15:28, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes we discussed these things before in : > [Vote] Showcase contributors in the Release Notes > http://markmail.org/thread/2fb7vjnzegmpsg43 > [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes > http://markmail.org/thread/pj6jvaepk5sl3pag
ah yes that’s it. It was this second thread that I was remembering! :) Ok so I/we just need to implement it and make it part of the release process. > The problem was that it's kind of hard to not forget someone. We also have > translators on l10n. > > The QA team could add themselves when they test the release (since usually > they test after the release and also they switch the attribution). Yes I thought about this too. Let’s try to automate first and then if it comes short we can use a manual step. Note that using resolution = fixed, will hide the case when a reporter reports a jira and we close it in another jira, marking the reported issue as “duplicate”. Thanks -Vincent > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We’ve been having 3 persons in the community who help test XWiki every day >> and who report jira issues: Ilie, Gabriela and Manuel. Manuel has been >> doing this over 4 years now (close to 5 actually)! >> >> They’re important and they help XWiki get better every day and release >> over release. >> >> I think we should recognize them more in the project. >> >> I have 2 ideas: >> * Mention this role of QA engineer on http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/ >> bin/view/Community/HallOfFame and make it more “official" >> * Make them visible in the RN. Right now in the RN we mention everyone who >> contributed code. I think we could also mention everyone who created a JIRA >> issue that got fixed during that release. >> >> WDYT? Any other idea? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> PS: I forgot if I already sent a mail on this topic or not (couldn’t find >> one but it vaguely rings a bell). Anyone remembers? :) >> >>
