Indeed npmtest-mathjs and npmdoc-mathjs don't looks like the kind of extension you would install.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > Great work. > The description looks a bit strange for the npmtest-mathjs and > npmdoc-mathjs. Do we really need those 'module'? Can we make a convention > and not display in EM the test and doc modules? > > Also what is the difference between mathjs-3.16.2 and MathJS-1.0.0. Also > the description is empty for MathJS. > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Krzysiek Płachno <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Hello XWiki team! >> >> I just write to brag a bit about *Extension Repository Connector - NPM* >> that I created in 3rd phase of GSoC ;) >> You can read about it here: >> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ >> Extension%20Repository%20Connector%20-%20NPM/ >> and >> test it if you wish (there's an example to follow). >> >> As before - any feedback highly appreciated :) >> >> Have a nice day! >> Best, >> Krzysztof >> -- Thomas Mortagne
