0

Thanks,
Caty

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1, sounds good to me.
>
> Also, if we could setup Nexus to clone just the org.xwiki artifacts from
> maven central, that might be a good compromise, but I could live without it
> also.
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > >> On 2 Oct 2017, at 10:14, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi devs,
> > >>
> > >> To remove a big step from the release I would like to modify a bit our
> > >> setup and deploy released xwiki-commons and xwiki-rendering artifacts
> > >> on Maven Central instead of nexus.xwiki.org/maven.xwiki.org.
> > >>
> > >> PRO:
> > >> * speed up releases
> > >> * less stuff to store on our side
> > >> * only one artifact for a specific version (right now they are built
> > >> twice which produce two different JARs in pratice)
> > >>
> > >> CONS:
> > >> * depends more on Maven Central
> > >>
> > >> In practice we already depend on Maven Central for many things so if
> > >> Maven Central ever end up dead the fact that we don't have the
> > >> artifact on our side is going to be the least of our issues :)
> > >>
> > >> So WDYT ?
> > >>
> > >> +1 on my side
> > >
> > > +1 to automate the release on Maven Central for commons/rendering.
> > >
> > > -0 (close to -1) to not releasing/copying commons/rendering artifacts
> on
> > maven.xwiki.org. I think it’s important that we can have the full list
> of
> > XWiki artifacts in a single place and I’d like that to be our place. If
> we
> > were publishing all our artifacts on Maven Central, I wouldn’t have this
> > problem but it’s not the case.
> >
> > You do have all our artifacts in one place (at least from browser
> > point of view) trough nexus.xwiki.org.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Thomas Mortagne
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> >
>

Reply via email to