As you said, we could say "Starting ... " or at least "Paying" because we need to differentiate the extensions, since the installation process differ, you need a license, you get support, etc.
Thanks, Caty On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 5 Oct 2017, at 15:41, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On 5 Oct 2017, at 15:25, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi devs, > >> > >> This is a small proposal that shows improvements related to: > >> - layout changes for ratings, > >> - the display of price for payed extensions, > > > > About this point only. > > > > It’s more complex actually since the pricing depends on a variety of > things: > > * whether you’re buying a pack or just one extension > > * for how many users you buy, > > * if there are discounts, promotion campaign, etc > > > > Thus we can’t put the price and this has to be computed by the target > paying store. > > > > Or we need to only indicate something like “Starting at XXX USD/EUR”. > > > > Personally I don’t think we should include the price there and it should > be up to the paying store to handle that. > > > > I’d say we just need to make more visible the link to the website for an > extension instead. > > Forgot to mention that instead of the price we should mention it’s a > paying extension. > > Also note that this isn’t just UI. It needs a change in the EM/Repository > app. > > The same kind of changes need to be done on e.x.o, i.e.inside the Repo app. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > >> - replacing the Silk icons with FontAwesome and > >> - experimenting with a custom Theme styling. > >> > >> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/ExtensionManager99 > >> > >> Let me know what you think. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Caty > > > >
