Hi, +1 for enabled by default while being skippable if needed.
Thanks, Alex On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com > wrote: > +1 I would like to not have pages since 2005 anymore, hope everything else > will be ok > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:11 PM Clément Aubin <aubincl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > +1 for enabled by default while being skippable if needed. > > > > Thanks, > > Clément > > > > On 07/31/2018 06:52 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Adel Atallah <adel.atal...@xwiki.com> > > wrote: > > >> +1 enabled by default, obviously. > > >> > > >> Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 18:43, Eduard Moraru <enygma2...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > >> > > >>> Hi, devs. > > >>> > > >>> We have had 2 previous discussions on this topic: > > >>> * July 2016 (discussion): https://markmail.org/thread/ > oodciq7pv6pj7eic > > >>> * Jan 2018 (proposal): https://markmail.org/thread/ymwsebvr3k7voy3p > > >>> > > >>> And we have at least 2 issues on this topic: > > >>> * Oct 2011: XWIKI-7058 <http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7058>: > Page > > >>> creation date should be the date of the installation > > >>> * Feb 2015: XCOMMONS-1447 <https://jira.xwiki.org/ > browse/XCOMMONS-1447 > > >: > > >>> XAR plugin should replace the dates with a common number > > >>> > > >>> TL;DR: It's causing confusion for our users to install pages that are > > >>> created in 2005/2009/etc. so we should avoid committing dates on git > > that > > >>> users might end up installing. > > >>> > > >>> Reminder: Importing a document with empty dates will: > > >>> * Use the current date if the document is new (i.e. does not exist in > > the > > >>> wiki) > > >>> * Use the existing dates if the document already exists in the wiki, > if > > >>> using backup import > > >>> * Use the current user and current date for the document update date, > > if > > >>> imported using non-backup import of EM extension install > > >>> > > >>> Adel and myself have extended the xar:verify and xar:format goals of > > the > > >>> xar plugin to check for the existence of date fields in the XML wiki > > pages > > >>> and to remove them. The fields are: > > >>> * date > > >>> * contentUpdateDate > > >>> * creationDate > > >>> * attachment/date > > >>> > > >>> See the PR https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/pull/44/ > > >>> > > >>> This check (on both verify and format goals) is skippable entirely > > with the > > >>> "xar.dates.skip property" (default to false) or > > >>> "xar.dates.skip.documentList" for individual documents (list of doc > > >>> references). > > >>> > > >>> I need your vote for accepting the existing PR and for removing the > > >>> document dates (e.g. https://github.com/xwiki/ > xwiki-platform/pull/792) > > and > > >>> your feedback in case you know of any problems that this might > create. > > >>> > > >>> Also, please mention if you would prefer for this behavior to be > > skipped by > > >>> default (and explicitly enabled on XWiki Standard, so that 3rd party > > code > > >>> is not impacted by this change). > > >>> > > >>> Here's my +1 (enabled by default and skippable if needed). > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Eduard > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
