Hi, I don’t remember discussing this with you Thomas. Actually I’m not convinced to have a fixed day: * we already have a fixed BFD and having a second one doesn’t leave much flexibility for working on roadmap items when it’s the best * test sessions can be short (0.5-1 hours) and it’s easy to do them between other tasks * it can be boring to spend a full day on them
Now, I agree that not having a fixed day will make it hard to make sure that we work 20% on that topic. So if you prefer we can define a day, knowing that some won’t be able to always attend during that day and in this case they should do it on another day. What’s important is to have 20% done each week (i.e. enough work done on it). In term of day, if we have to choose one, I’d say Tuesday. That’s the most logical to me. WDYT? What do you prefer? Thanks -Vincent > On 30 Aug 2018, at 10:38, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> wrote: > > Indeed we discussed this but I don't see it in your mail Vincent. > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Adel Atallah <adel.atal...@xwiki.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe we should agree on having a whole day dedicated on using these >> tools with a maximum number of developers. >> That way we will be able to help each other and maybe it will make the >> process easier to carry out in the future. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Thanks, >> Adel >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >>> Hi devs (and anyone else interested to improve the tests of XWiki), >>> >>> History >>> ====== >>> >>> It all started when I analyzed our global TPC and found that it was going >>> down globally even though we have the fail-build-on-jacoco-threshold >>> strategy. >>> >>> I sent several email threads: >>> >>> - Loss of TPC: http://markmail.org/message/hqumkdiz7jm76ya6 >>> - TPC evolution: http://markmail.org/message/up2gc2zzbbe4uqgn >>> - Improve our TPC strategy: http://markmail.org/message/grphwta63pp5p4l7 >>> >>> Note: As a consequence of this last thread, I implemented a Jenkins >>> Pipeline to send us a mail when the global TPC of an XWiki module goes down >>> so that we fix it ASAP. This is still a development in progress. A first >>> version is done and running at https://ci.xwiki.org/view/Tools/job/Clover/ >>> but I need to debug it and fix it (it’s not working ATM). >>> >>> As a result of the global TPC going down/stagnating, I have proposed to >>> have 10.7 focused on Tests + BFD. >>> - Initially I proposed to focus on increasing the global TPC by looking at >>> the reports from 1) above (http://markmail.org/message/qjemnip7hjva2rjd). >>> See the last report at https://up1.xwikisas.com/#mJ0loeB6nBrAgYeKA7MGGw (we >>> need to fix the red parts). >>> - Then with the STAMP mid-term review, a bigger urgency surfaced and I >>> asked if we could instead focus on fixing tests as reported by Descartes to >>> increase both coverage and mutation score (ie test quality), since those >>> are 2 metrics/KPIs measured by STAMP and since XWiki participates to STAMP >>> we need to work on them and increase them substantially. See >>> http://markmail.org/message/ejmdkf3hx7drkj52 >>> >>> The results of XWiki 10.7 has been quite poor on test improvements (more >>> focus on BFD than tests, lots of devs on holidays, etc). This forces us to >>> have a different strategy. >>> >>> Full Strategy proposal >>> ================= >>> >>> 1) As many XWiki SAS devs as possible (and anyone else from the community >>> who’s interested ofc! :)) should spend 1 day per week working on improving >>> STAMP metrics >>> * Currently the agreement is that Thomas and myself will do this for the >>> foreseeable future till we get some good-enough metric progress >>> * Some other devs from XWiki SAS will help out for XWiki 10.8 only FTM >>> (Marius, Adel if he can, Simon in the future). The idea is to see where >>> that could get us by using substantial manpower. >>> >>> 2) All committers: More generally the global TPC failure is also already >>> active and dev need to modify modules that see their global TPC go down. >>> >>> 3) All committers: Of course, the jacoco strategy is also active at each >>> module level. >>> >>> STAMP tools >>> ========== >>> >>> There are 4 tools developed by STAMP: >>> * Descartes: Improves quality of tests by increasing their mutation scores. >>> See http://markmail.org/message/bonb5f7f37omnnog and also >>> https://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/MutationTestingDescartes >>> * DSpot: Automatically generate new tests, based on existing tests. See >>> https://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/TestGenerationDspot >>> * CAMP: Takes a Dockerfile and generates mutations of it, then deploys and >>> execute tests on the software to see if the mutation works or not. Note >>> this is currently not fitting the need of XWiki and thus I’ve been >>> developing another tool as an experiment (which may go back in CAMP one >>> day), based on TestContainers, see >>> https://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/EnvironmentTestingExperimentations >>> * EvoCrash: Takes a stack trace from production logs and generates a test >>> that, when executed, reproduces the crash. See >>> https://markmail.org/message/v74g3tsmflquqwra. See also >>> https://github.com/SERG-Delft/EvoCrash >>> >>> Since XWiki is part of the STAMP research project, we need to use those 4 >>> tools to increase the KPIs associated with the tools. See below. >>> >>> Objectives/KPIs/Metrics for STAMP >>> =========================== >>> >>> The STAMP project has defined 9 KPIs that all partners (and thus XWiki) >>> need to work on: >>> >>> 1) K01: Increase test coverage >>> * Global increase by reducing by 40% the non-covered code. For XWiki since >>> we’re at about 70%, this means reaching about 80% before the end of STAMP >>> (ie. before end of 2019) >>> * Increase the coverage contributions of each tool developed by STAMP. >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Primary goal: >>> ** Increase coverage by executing Descartes and improving our tests. This >>> is http://markmail.org/message/ejmdkf3hx7drkj52 >>> ** Don’t do anything with DSpot. I’ll do that part. Note that the goal is >>> to write a Jenkins pipeline to automatically execute DSpot from time to >>> time and commit the generated tests in a separate test source and have our >>> build execute both src/test/java and this new test source. >>> ** Don’t do anything with TestContainers FTM since I need to finish a first >>> working version. I may need help in the future to implement docker images >>> for more configurations (on Oracle, in a cluster, with LibreOffice, with an >>> external SOLR server, etc). >>> ** For EvoCrash: We’ll count contributions of EvoCrash to coverage in K08. >>> * Secondary goal: >>> ** Increase our global TPC as mentioned above by fixing the modules in red. >>> >>> 2) K02: Reduce flaky tests. >>> * Objective: reduce the number of flaky tests by 20% >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Record flaky tests in jira >>> * Fix the max number of them >>> >>> 3) K03: Better test quality >>> * Objective: increase mutation score by 20% >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Same strategy as K01. >>> >>> 4) K04: More configuration-related paths tested >>> * Objective: increase the code coverage of configuration-related paths in >>> our code by 20% (e.g. DB schema creation, cluster)related code, >>> SOLR-related code, LibreOffice-related code, etc). >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Leave it to FTM. The idea is to measure Clover TPC with the base >>> configuration, then execute all other configurations (with TestContainers) >>> and regenerate the Clover report to see how much the TPC has increased. >>> >>> 5) K05: Reduce system-specific bugs >>> * Objective: 30% improvement >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Run TestContainers, execute existing tests and find new bugs related to >>> configurations. Record them >>> >>> 6) K06: More configurations/Faster tests >>> * Objective: increase the number of automatically tested configurations by >>> 50% >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * Increase the # of configurations we test with TestContainers. I’ll do >>> that part initially. >>> * Reduce time it takes to deploy the software under a given configuration >>> vs time it used to take when done manually before STAMP. I’ll do this one. >>> I’ve already worked on it in the past year with the dockerization of XWiki. >>> >>> 7) K07: Pending, nothing to do FTM >>> >>> 8) K08: More crash replicating test cases >>> * Objective: increase the number of crash replicating test cases by at >>> least 70% >>> >>> Strategy: >>> * For all issues that are still open and that have stack traces and for all >>> issues closed but without tests, run EvoCrash on them to try to generate a >>> test. >>> * Record and count the number of successful EvoCrash-generated test cases. >>> * Derive a regression test (which can be very different from the negative >>> of the test generated by evocrash!). >>> * Measure the new coverage increase >>> * Note that I haven’t experimented much with this yet myself. >>> >>> 9) K09: Pending, nothing to do FTM. >>> >>> Conclusion >>> ========= >>> >>> Right now, I need your help for the following KPIs: K01, K02, K03, K08. >>> >>> Since there’s a lot to understand in this email, I’m open to: >>> * Organizing a meeting on youtube live to discuss all this >>> * Answering any questions on this thread ofc >>> * Also feel free to ask on IRC/Matrix. >>> >>> Here’s an extract from STAMP which has more details about the KPIs/metrics: >>> https://up1.xwikisas.com/#QJyxqspKXSzuWNOHUuAaEA >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne
