Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:31:32 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: devscripts: Please consider including the 'yodack' tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #688319,
regarding devscripts: Please consider including the 'yodack' tool
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
688319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688319
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.12.3
Severity: wishlist
As of a few days ago, it is possible to upload signed command files to
ftp-master, granting/revoking DM upload permissions, as originally
explained by Ansgar Burchardt on -project@ in June:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/06/msg00321.html
In an attempt to make constructing and uploading such files easier, I
wrote a little tool called "Ye Olde Debian Archive Control Kit"
(yodack)[1]. It's a simple shell script with a conffile, a separate
package for it is overkill, therefore I'd like to ask for its inclusion
into devscripts.
If the tool is deemed worthy for devscripts, I'll happily prepare a
patch against devscripts git that does the necessary things to pull
yodack in.
As an example of what the tool can do, the following line does just what
it reads:
$ yodack on ftp-master.debian.org, \
for debian maintainer [email protected], \
please grant upload rights on dh-exec, ivykis, \
but deny uploads of eglibc, bash.
Thanks for considering!
[1]: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/algernon/yodack.git;a=summary
--
|8]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Turns out that there's another tool in the works, with similar
intentions to yodack: replacing dcut & dput aswell as providing an
interface to generating .dak-commands.
Difference is, dputng is closer to that goal than yodack, and will be a
separate package.
I don't see the point in having two tools that do essentially the same
thing, and since yodack's the inferior one, lets not split effort: I'm
closing this wishlist.
--
|8]
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
devscripts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
