Am Dienstag, den 04.06.2013, 18:57 -0700 schrieb Matt Taggart: > James McCoy writes: > > > A heads up that you were interested in a backport would have been nice. > > We're generally responsive to uploading backports. > > > > I would also have preferred to have the changes tracked in our git > > repository (which is in collab-maint) so we have something to base a > > subsequent backport off of. > > Hi, > > Sorry for the lack of heads up. Next time I'll just have you do it I think. > > Zero changes in devscripts were needed, just backported python3-magic and > python3-debian at build time since they weren't in wheezy. Backporting > python3-magic (source package 'file') required a backported > distro-info-data package or the build time tests fail. However the d-i-d > package I uploaded has a bpo style version number that will prove > problematic with the version sitting in stable proposed updates, so the > whole lot is held up for that at the moment.
distro-info-data shouldn't be backported, because it will get updated via stable proposed updates. PS: python3-magic does not depend on distro-info-data, but devscripts does. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
