Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 00:22 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> The branch contains a preliminary working version, but not all
> combinations have been tested, and the untested probably fail in very
> obvious ways.
> 
> Next up: Writing a sufficiently complete test suite.

done, looks like the code was actually working quite well. Merged into
master, to give it some testing. Feel free to play around with it now,
if you are so inclined.

TODO:
 * Handling it more gracefully if the resulting tarball filename is 
   actually passed (which may make sense if one wants to remove more 
   files from it).
 * What about the +dfsg functionality? Is that the callers (in 
   particular uscan’s) task  or should mk-origtargz do this?

I’m leaning towards the former; version mangling is uscan’s field of
work. Also when taking the version number from debian/changelog, such
version modifications will already have taken place.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devscripts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel

Reply via email to