Hello I've recently fixed licensecheck to correctly detect BSD-2-clauses licenses.
When only one clause is used, licensecheck mentions "BSD" license. Turns out that there's no "official" BSD 1 clause license. The only "official" BSD licenses [1] are: - BSD-2-clause - BSD-3-clause I fear that using "BSD" keyword for a reduced BSD-2-clause license may induce people in wrongly believing that this license is "official". The other option is to use a keyword like "BSD-source-clause-only". This is more accurate but is quite long. What do you think ? All the best [1] http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php -- https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
