On Wednesday 18 November 2015 08:41:42 Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Sorry I have not replied.
No problem. I am sometimes also "distracted" by real life... > The thing is I don't care how licensecheck copes with difficult > cases like pdf files or whatever. I know some people do and obviously you > need to engange with them. all I care about is that when licensecheck is in > recursive mode it does not miss any files which it would handle > correctly if asked explicitly. I have had the impression it is prone to > this, but I have been remiss in not checking this out more throughly. Yes, there was a bug, And using 'file' to select files to scan was not a good idea. > Next time I get this impression I will persue it. I almost thought I had > found this recently but it turned out to be my misunderstanding so for > now I have no feedback. You'll be welcome to test the next version of licensecheck (as Jonas) to make sure that the old behavior is correctly restored All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
