On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:42 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 05/18/2016 03:29 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > In the Red Hat registry I can only get AtomicApp from: > > > > docker pull devstudio/atomicapp > > OR > > docker pull cdk_beta/atomicapp (OUTDATED) > > > > > > This doesn't seem right to me. What toplevel should we be under? > > > Also the tags for atomicapp in the registry are inappropriate. The > latest version is 0.5.0 but the tags that I can pull from are: > > ``` > # skopeo registry.access.redhat.com/devstudio/atomicapp 2>/dev/null > | jq '.RepoTags' > [ > "7.2-13", > "latest" > ] > ```
Tag is now fixed for atomicapp, please give it a try. ``` # skopeo registry.access.redhat.com/devstudio/atomicapp 2>/dev/null | jq '.RepoTags' [ "0.5.0", "latest" ] ``` > > What we are doing upstream looks much different: > > ``` > # skopeo docker.io/projectatomic/atomicapp 2>/dev/null | jq > '.RepoTags' > > > [ > "0.0.1", > "0.1.0", > "0.1.1", > "0.1.10", > "0.1.11", > "0.1.12", > "0.1.2", > "0.1.3", > "0.2.1", > "0.2.2", > "0.2.3", > "0.3.0", > "0.3.1", > "0.4.0", > "0.4.1", > "0.4.2", > "0.4.3", > "0.4.4", > "0.4.5", > "0.5.0", > "0.5.1", > "dev", > "latest" > ] > ``` > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools _______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
