It should be "eclipse ." We would not want this to be the behavior of "eclipse"
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Mickael Istria <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your report, I opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ > show_bug.cgi?id=500388 > However, a first iteration will be that `eclipse .` will do things to > correctly handle the current directory, making it happen on plan `eclipse` > command will be another story. Is `eclipse .` good enough to you, or is it > worth doing it only if we have it on plain `eclipse` ? > -- > Mickael Istria > Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools> > My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets > <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria> > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > >
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
