*** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
> However forwarded requests from the 137 VLAN which should be comming in
> via hme0 were being reported as comming in via le0, dhcpd then suitably
> NAKed their renew request ( and presumably sent the reply out le0...)
> This resulted in the hosts in VLAN 137 getting rather distressed.
> Currently their are no dhcp clients in VLAN 185, so I dont know if
> they would have worked properly - but the relayed requests were definatly
> messed up!.
This is not a DLPI problem - it's a configuration problem. If the
server is reporting packets as having arrived on le0, that's the
network on which they were sent (unless they're unicast renewals, of
course). If they had been relayed, it would have reported that they
arrived via the IP address of the relay agent.
You use the term "VLAN" quite freely in your message. What do you
mean by this? Are you talking about a network segment with more than
one logical subnet? Or are you talking about something else?
In any case, I'm pretty sure that your actual network configuration
and the configuration you described to dhcpd are not the same, and
this is why you are having trouble.
_MelloN_
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists
If you are without web access, or if you are having trouble with the web page,
please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please try to use the web
page first - it will take a long time for your request to be processed by hand.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
