*** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
This is a resend:
>Has anyone had trouble with Windows 95/98/NT clients releasing an
>address assigned to it from the DHCP server?
>
>I am using RH Linux 5.1 kernel 2.0.35 with ISC DHCP v2.0b1pl2 on some
>servers and v2.0b1pl6 on others. I seem to remember that when I was
>initially implementing DHCP v1 on my systems that when I released an
>address from the client, it would release and I would get a different
>address when I sent out a NEW request (not a renew). Am I going mad
or
>is this supposed to be the way it works?
>
>When I check the leases file, the lease is released and I have even
gone
>in and deleted any old references to that lease in the leases file, but
>nothing worked. The client still received the address it previously
>had. When we move a client from one subnet to another it obviously
gets
>a different address at that time, but not when on same subnet.
>
>What I am trying to accomplish is this: We had a range of addresses in
>the pool on a particular subnet which was in the "high" range. We then
>expanded the range to include more of the "low" range of addresses. We
>would like the PC's that were assigned addresses in the high range to
>now receive addresses in the low range.
>
>If anyone can help, I'd greatly appreciate it.
>
>Thanks...Jill.
>
>Jill K. Smith
>Lockheed Martin
>919-541-5323
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://network.epa.gov:9876
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists
If you are without web access, or if you are having trouble with the web page,
please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please try to use the web
page first - it will take a long time for your request to be processed by hand.
Archives for this mailing list are available at
http://www.webnology.com/list-archives/dhcp/dhcp-server
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
