Send dhcp-users mailing list submissions to
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
dhcp-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
dhcp-users-ow...@lists.isc.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dhcp-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Regarding the dhcp lease time (Simon Hobson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:24:45 +0100
From: Simon Hobson <dh...@thehobsons.co.uk>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding the dhcp lease time
Message-ID: <f616ecbe-a78b-4fe8-bc0a-f0484a8f4...@thehobsons.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Rob Janssen <r...@ision.nl.eu.org> wrote:
> I have seen such postings many times on NTP lists and groups, where a "local
> team" wants to validate the operation of the NTP service and decides to write
> a testplan similar to this:
>
> - setup an isolated local network with a client and a server
> ...
> - manually change the clock of the client (or the server) by several years ...
>
> When that does not work out, they come and ask why.
Or come here and ask why the DHCP service is "broken" !
> Having a LAN address of 169.254.x.x is not that uncommon in such test
> environments.
Which is still not valid for a DHCP server - common or not.
We'll just have to wait for the OP to come back with an alternative narrative
;-)
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
------------------------------
End of dhcp-users Digest, Vol 127, Issue 8
******************************************
