Send dhcp-users mailing list submissions to
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
dhcp-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
dhcp-users-ow...@lists.isc.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dhcp-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: strange behavior of shared network (Milan Kovac)
2. Re: strange behavior of shared network (Simon Hobson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:59:14 +0200
From: Milan Kovac <kova...@gmail.com>
To: dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: strange behavior of shared network
Message-ID: <75e4d23f-ed88-1592-77ce-85878bae8...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi Guys,
so the problem was:
In subnet which is only for static clients, can`t be defined range.
Now everything works correctly, but strange is, that? it worked
correctly 2 years, and when I added the last 11th subnet, problem was there.
Many thanks for cooperation
Milan
D?a 4. 10. 2019 o 21:42 Simon Hobson nap?sal(a):
> Sten Carlsen <st...@s-carlsen.dk> wrote:
>
>> Looking at the data you give, I see no conflict. Can you be more specific
>> about the problem?
> You can't see it when it's been pointed out ?
>
>>>>> subnet 157.157.56.128 netmask 255.255.255.240 {
>>>>> option broadcast-address 157.157.56.143;
>>>>> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.240;
>>>>> option routers 157.157.56.129;
>>>>> deny unknown-clients;
>>>>> range 157.157.56.130 157.157.56.142;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> host Divinka-Uhliarik {
>>>>> hardware ethernet cc:2d:e0:3f:fa:42;
>>>>> fixed-address 157.157.56.130;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> }
>>>>> host Divinka-Obecny-Urad {
>>>>> hardware ethernet 00:4f:74:31:b4:03;
>>>>> fixed-address 157.157.56.131;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Hosts with fixed addresses that are within a dynamic range. Recipe for
> problems.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 12:54:40 +0100
From: Simon Hobson <dh...@thehobsons.co.uk>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org>
Subject: Re: strange behavior of shared network
Message-ID: <bf5ec9d5-fc30-4fac-9e7e-455d85213...@thehobsons.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Milan Kovac <kova...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>so the problem was:
>
>In subnet which is only for static clients, can`t be defined range.
You can have static and dynamic in one subnet - but the addresses cannot
overlap.
>Now everything works correctly, but strange is, that? it worked
>correctly 2 years, and when I added the last 11th subnet, problem was
>there.
It can happen.
Did any other subnets have the same overlap between statuc & dynamic clients ?
If not, then you wouldn't have triggered the issue before.
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
------------------------------
End of dhcp-users Digest, Vol 132, Issue 7
******************************************
