Send dhcp-users mailing list submissions to dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dhcp-users-requ...@lists.isc.org You can reach the person managing the list at dhcp-users-ow...@lists.isc.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dhcp-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. dhcpd not seeing HCPDISCOVER traffic (dhcp-quest...@kraitch.net) 2. Re: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (Bill Shirley) 3. Re: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (Glenn Satchell) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:07:18 -0700 From: dhcp-quest...@kraitch.net To: dhcp-users@lists.isc.org Subject: dhcpd not seeing HCPDISCOVER traffic Message-ID: <613a8596.hP1CSJZ1ezQiTP5/%dhcp-quest...@kraitch.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello. We have a stable working single VRF *virtual routing and Forwarding) network technology with routers perfuming dhcp relaying for multiple networks to ISC 4.4.2-P1 DHCP revers running on RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) 7 servers. We are migrating to a multiple VRF environment. We were surprised when we encountered an issue with our first test network on a new VRF with the router dhcp relaying to a dhcp server on the original VRF did not work. The dhcp server does not appear to see and does not log or process the DHCPDISCOVER traffic being relayed form the new VRF. When we run tcpdump on the dhcp server, tcpdump does see the DHCPDISCOVER traffic being relayed form the new VRF. We also noticed that tcpdump showed the DHCPDISCOVER traffic has a "bad udp cksum." Could the bad checksum be why the dhcp server is not logging or processing the DHCPDISCOVER requests? We tried compiling dhcpd with DEBUG_CHECKSUM_VERBOSE defined in in includes/site.h but that did not appears to provide any helpful insight. BTW, we could not compile with DEBUG_CHECKSUM defined. "ethtool -k" on a RHEL dhcp server showed that offload of checksums was enabled. Disabling offloading did not change tcpdump shewing bad udp checksums and did not result in dhcpd seeing and processing the DHCPDISCOVERs with bad udp checksums. Assuming the bad udp checksums are why dhcpod is not processing the DHCPDISCOVERs, what can be done from the dhcpd end? There does not be a #define to ignore bad udp checksums. We are not sure what the code in common//packet.c does but it might be a candidate for modification if ignoring the bad udp checksums is possible, Our main question remains are the bad udp checksums on the DHCPDISCOVERs preventing the fault dhcpd from providing dhco support? Thanks, mark ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:57:59 -0400 From: Bill Shirley <b...@c3po.polymerindustries.biz> To: dhcp-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Message-ID: <a9de3a92-20e4-fbd6-d731-ff9e731d2...@c3po.polymerindustries.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" # local proxy autodiscovery option local-pac-server??????????? code 252 = text; subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { ? option local-pac-server "http://www.example.com/wpad.dat"; . } Bill On 9/8/2021 12:30 PM, perl-list wrote: > I have no specific knowledge of option 252, but, generally speaking in the > dhcp config file when defining a string value, it is usually in quotes. I > would guess that to be the case with this as well. > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Parkin, Richard (R.)" <rpark...@ford.com> >> To: "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:09:04 AM >> Subject: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery >> Greetings! >> I have a question about configuring Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery. >> Our IPAM allowed me to generate a configuration statement that resembles >> this: >> option 252 http://example.com/wpad.dat; >> What I am wondering is if the URL string needs to be quoted for this to work, >> like so: >> option 252 ?http://example.com/wpad.dat?; >> I haven?t been able to find a definitive answer. Is it safer to assume the >> quotes are needed? >> Thanks! >> -- >> Rich Parkin >> Ford Motor Company >> DDI Planner (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) >> _______________________________________________ >> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. >> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. >> dhcp-users mailing list >> dhcp-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. >> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. >> >> dhcp-users mailing list >> dhcp-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20210910/82b46833/attachment-0001.htm> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:20:41 +1000 From: Glenn Satchell <glenn.satch...@uniq.com.au> To: Users of ISC DHCP <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org> Subject: Re: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Message-ID: <c87b19a2b51a1e465cb86004cb77f...@uniq.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi Richard, The definitive answer is in the dhcp-options man page: REFERENCE: OPTION STATEMENTS The text data type specifies an NVT ASCII string, which must be enclosed in double quotes - for example, to specify a root-path option, the syntax would be option root-path "10.0.1.4:/var/tmp/rootfs"; and further down that same document TEXT option new-name code new-code = text ; An option whose type is text will encode an ASCII text string. For example: option sql-default-connection-name code 194 = text; option sql-default-connection-name "PRODZA"; regards, Glenn On 2021-09-10 16:57, Bill Shirley wrote: > # local proxy autodiscovery > option local-pac-server code 252 = text; > > subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { > option local-pac-server "http://www.example.com/wpad.dat"; > . > } > > Bill > > On 9/8/2021 12:30 PM, perl-list wrote: > > I have no specific knowledge of option 252, but, generally speaking in > the dhcp config file when defining a string value, it is usually in > quotes. I would guess that to be the case with this as well. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Parkin, Richard (R.)" <rpark...@ford.com> > To: "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org> > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:09:04 AM > Subject: Question about Option 252 for Web Proxy Auto-Discovery > > Greetings! > > I have a question about configuring Option 252 for Web Proxy > Auto-Discovery. > > Our IPAM allowed me to generate a configuration statement that > resembles this: > > option 252 http://example.com/wpad.dat; > > What I am wondering is if the URL string needs to be quoted for this to > work, > like so: > > option 252 "http://example.com/wpad.dat"; > > I haven't been able to find a definitive answer. Is it safer to assume > the > quotes are needed? > > Thanks! > > -- > > Rich Parkin > > Ford Motor Company > > DDI Planner (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) > > _______________________________________________ > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > dhcp-users mailing list > dhcp-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users > > _______________________________________________ > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > dhcp-users mailing list > dhcp-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users _______________________________________________ ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. dhcp-users mailing list dhcp-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. dhcp-users mailing list dhcp-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users ------------------------------ End of dhcp-users Digest, Vol 155, Issue 5 ******************************************