Send dhcp-users mailing list submissions to
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
dhcp-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
dhcp-users-ow...@lists.isc.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dhcp-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Getting failover: link startup timeout (Kraishak Mahtha)
2. Re: Getting failover: link startup timeout (Darren Ankney)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:53:52 +0530
From: Kraishak Mahtha <kraishak....@gmail.com>
To: Bob McDonald <bmcdonal...@gmail.com>
Cc: dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Getting failover: link startup timeout
Message-ID:
<CADDat84fU-v=d_+6fupdbysgg5mf105j8tn4jcekyjc3mbl...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Bob, Sorry I didn't get you, The ports are not duplicated in the second
case
Case 1)Failover-peer1 (Server A and Server B)--port 647
and Failover-peer-2(Server B and Server A) --> port 648
Case 2) Failover-peer1 (ServerA --primary port 647 and Server
B--failover-port 648)
and Failover-peer-2(Server B --primary port 649 and Server A-->failover
port 650)
In the second case, we don't have duplicate ports, and to your earlier
statement
I tried both cases and both have issues
First, your config isn't correct. You have both the primary and secondary
configured with the same IP address
---> Is using the same server as primary and failover a wrong thing in ISC?
Thanks
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 6:27?PM Bob McDonald <bmcdonal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Upon re-reading my post, I have responded incorrectly. Instead of
> duplicating the IP address of the two servers, I meant to point out that
> the port was duplicated.
>
> Mea culpa,
>
> Bob
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20230703/bef31e5d/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 05:33:53 -0400
From: Darren Ankney <darren.ank...@gmail.com>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org>
Cc: Bob McDonald <bmcdonal...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting failover: link startup timeout
Message-ID:
<cakabwhg5mhcswlli9-sh7bnrhm2zvevvpov+zrdk8grtma9...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi Kraishak,
> ---> Is using the same server as primary and failover a wrong thing in ISC?
I doubt anyone has tried that (why would you?). The usual
configuration is a primary and secondary server which are separate
servers. The servers don't switch rolls for certain subnets.
Sometimes a hub and spoke configuration may appear where there is one
primary and several secondaries for various subnets (only one
secondary per subnet) and the primary has all subnets.
Thank you,
Darren Ankney
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
------------------------------
End of dhcp-users Digest, Vol 176, Issue 3
******************************************
