Everyone, there is an option for gmail called "reply all by default", please enable it...
-- Morten On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Adding back dev-core. > > Yes, I agree. Honestly, for me.. I care less about about the html output.. > we can use whatever. But I use IntelliJ for my web dev (actually all dev), > and using jsdoc helps me *alot*, simple things like type verification / > auto-completion. > > -- > Morten > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Mark Polak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Agreed. I believe we should create the core D2JS as a JS library that >> D2.angular.js is build on top of. >> >> Which would mean that what i now created as d2js would be d2.angular.js >> and “the real d2js” would include more “portable” things that are not >> framework specific but more “services” that you can use which could then be >> exposed to angular though d2.angular.js. >> >> Note: Still does not mean we can’t use dgeni for normal d2js as well. As >> it is just pretty much a parser for your JSDoc. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Mark Polak >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> +47 970 36 752 >> >> On 09 Oct 2014, at 16:13, Morten Olav Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not convinced we should limit ourselves to AngularJS in D2js. We >> should definetely have d2.anguar.js, but should we only rely on AJS, I'm >> not sure.. >> >> This is why i tried to push a D2js on our last call. I would hate seeing >> us become a AJS shop only, we definitely want to make it nice for AJS >> developers, but it also feels limiting. >> >> I tried to push this a bit on our Oslo meeting, maybe I didn't push >> enough (disclaimer, I'm a big fan of AngularJS). But as you all know, there >> will always be a next-big-thing in JavaScript, and I feel we might be >> limiting ourselves if we only care about AJS (internally it makes sense, >> but externally......) >> >> -- >> Morten >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Mark Polak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey Morten and JS people, >>> >>> Since we will be building in AngularJS we should be using >>> https://github.com/angular/dgeni it is pretty much an extension for >>> JSDoc. I created a repository with the packages as well. Which is available >>> through NPM. (Which might be out of sync with the most current version of >>> dgeni atm) >>> >>> What something like that will result into looks like >>> http://markionium.github.io/d2-docs/ (The top menu should work fine but >>> the navigation is a bit wonky as Github pages does not support AngularJS >>> html5mode as that needs server support (Which might also be a thing we have >>> to look at if that would be important for our apps.) >>> >>> Anyways as for D2 (https://github.com/Markionium/d2). What it is right >>> now is pretty much just a collection of services and directive that i was >>> creating while working on apps. A lot of it will need cleaning up and >>> refactoring. >>> >>> For example the thing we mentioned earlier about the bootstrapping. (I >>> will look at that sometime next week hopefully). >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Mark Polak >>> [email protected] >>> [email protected] >>> +47 970 36 752 >>> >>> On 09 Oct 2014, at 15:22, Morten Olav Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> Just wanted to tell you about JSDoc [1], its a documentation format for >>> documenting JavaScript code, I'm already using it in dhis2.period.js, and >>> it has many benefits. >>> >>> The most obvious benefit is proper autocompletion and also type >>> handling, as an example, please consider this: >>> >>> function hello(a,b,c) {} >>> hello(1,2,3); >>> >>> The JS compiler/evaluator have no idea how to interpret the parameters >>> to this function since JS is not type aware by default. So it will just >>> accept anything. >>> >>> Then please consider this: >>> >>> /** >>> * @param {String} a String parameter >>> * @param {Number} a number >>> * @param {Number} Another number >>> */ >>> function hello(a,b,c) {} >>> hello(1,2,3); >>> >>> Now the IDE will say that the first argument is wrong, since it expected >>> a string to be passed, but argument 2 and 3 is correct. >>> >>> I can only vouch for IntelliJ's handling of this, but I'm going to >>> assume Eclipse have similar mechanics in place. >>> >>> For our D2js library, we will be using JSDoc all over the place, which >>> will make it a lot easier to use within an IDE. >>> >>> [1] http://usejsdoc.org/ >>> >>> -- >>> Morten >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs-core >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs-core >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
