On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Bob Jolliffe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 September 2011 17:01, Jason Pickering <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Not sure, but it may have something to do with 1.4 > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/dhis2/+bug/517047 > > > > which includes an exchange between ourselves. > > > > It does not seem to make a lot of sense, other than to facilitate > > imports from 1.4 where a (unique) code is not required. > > Alright. That was it. Wonder what they use code for? Whatever it is used for, I don't think that is a sufficiently good reason for us to not make it unique. Knut > > > > Regards, > > Jason > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Bob Jolliffe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Can someone point me back to the rationale for allowing non-unique > >> codes for dataelements etc in the database model. I'm struggling to > >> understand this requirement. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Bob > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > >> Post to : [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Cheers, Knut Staring
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
