On 22 September 2011 16:26, Knut Staring <knu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Designing to enable bootstrapping
Or is that bootstrapping to aid designing :-) Seriously though, whether this is done internally (ie from inside the distributed war) or externally is not a major decision we have to make now. What I'd still like is some suggestions around what might be in a core set of useful concepts. I've had one suggestion which is "nothing at all" That's an easy one to deliver. Any others? Maybe its too early to ask this before we see some functionality. In defence of external bootstrapping kits, one could better address i18n concerns this way. > > Regards, Knut (via mobile phone) > > On Sep 22, 2011 5:13 PM, "Abyot Gizaw" <aby...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I take bootstrapping at implementation level than at design level >> >> 2011/9/22 Lars Helge Øverland <larshe...@gmail.com> >> >>> I think "bootstrapping" with most popular concepts make sense here. We >>> are not really tying anyone's hands, just offering some standard >>> options, one can always remove or add new ones. >>> >>> Lars >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
