I think it makes much more sense for the "User Orgunit parameter" to be the actual orgunit of the user (what I guess is now called data capture orgunit), so that the data most important/relevant to the user is what is shown on the dashboard etc.
What data the user can access beyond/above that in the hierarchy is a separate issue. Given that we try to make the default behaviour in 2.15 "just as before", but with the option to use these new control features where appropriate, I think the user orgunit should also be "just as before". Ola -------- ---------------------------------- Ola Hodne Titlestad (Mr) HISP Department of Informatics University of Oslo Mobile: +47 48069736 Home address: Eftasåsen 68, 0687 Oslo, Norway. Googlemaps link<https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Eftas%C3%A5sen+68,+0687+Oslo,+Norge&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sll=59.893855,10.785116&sspn=0.222842,0.585709&oq=eftas%C3%A5sen+68,+0687+Oslo,+&t=h&hnear=Eftas%C3%A5sen+68,+%C3%98stensj%C3%B8,+0687+Oslo,+Norway&z=16> On 25 April 2014 10:33, Lars Helge Øverland <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > like you point out we switched to using the "data view org unit" as basis > for the "user org unit" in analysis. > > I guess your problem is that you would like the user org unit to work like > before, in your case display the district, while still allow users to > access and view data for the country. > > I suspect that some would like it the way it is in 2.15, but I am open to > going back to use the "data capture" org unit as basis for "user org unit". > Anyone with strong opinions in this matter? > > regards, > > Lars > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Jason Pickering < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Devs, >> We are trying to figure out how to best use the new functionality which >> splits the analysis and maintenance orgunits. In our case, the district >> health officers should be allowed to maintain their own facilities, but >> should also be allowed to view data from other districts (and provinces). >> When we create graphs using "User orgunit", the graphs appear at the >> national level, when the district officers are assigned to the national >> level as their analysis orgunit. When we assign the district level user to >> their own district as their analysis unit, they are no longer able to view >> data from other district. I know the reason of why this has been done, but >> for some implementations, the systems needs to be more open, so that users >> can view data from their own districts as well as their own, similar to how >> it was in previous versions. >> >> How do you suggest that we handle this situation? >> >> Regards, >> Jason >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
