Hi Lars, The aim of my email was to increase the UI constraint to fit that of the db :0)
While I understand the reasoning behind shortening the DE name field, reducing the db constraint now will have a major impact on existing instances. We currently have 117 out of 917 DE in the Core Standards system (which has been in Production for just over 2 years now) exceeding 160 characters.This is a stable system that is a replica of a DHIS1.4 system (which is also still in use). We are also in the process of setting up a new CS db with a whole new set of DE (a few thousand) and the DE name length constraint provided to the NDoH was 230. I'm not sure if any of our other DHIS2 dbs have DE names that exceed 160 char as well. Elmarie/Calle? Reducing the number of DE name characters might affect interoperability with DHIS1.4 (which will be around for at least another year or two) and has a db DE name constraint of 230. P.S there is also a misfit between DE Group and DE Group Set name lengths -- Regards, Crizelle Nel [image: HISP_Logo_sm] Software Development and Information Systems *Health Information Systems Program (HISP) - SA------------------------------------------------------------------------------* Email: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cell: +27 84 580 3342 Fax: 0866 509 502 Skype: crizelle_nel Website: http://www.hisp.org 66 Rigel Avenue North, Waterkloof Ridge Pretoria, 0181, South Africa E -25.7847787 S 28.2347984 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Lars Helge Øverland <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Crizelle, > > good point. It's actually supposed to be 160, I have corrected that now. > The misfit between db constraint and ui constraint is unfortunate but its > the UI one that's most reasonable. > > The reason why we constrain it is that these kind of very long names > really makes the UI unusable - its impossible to read in most analysis > modules and you often cannot see the end of the text in the maintenance UI. > > 160 character is a pretty long name when you think of it. I would say its > not good practice to have such long names - better to find a way to reduce > the length of the name... > > regards, > > Lars > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Crizelle Nel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The dataelement table allows for DE names to be up to 230 characters. But >> when adding a DE name through the UI there is a limitation of 150 >> characters. >> >> Can someone perhaps explain why this is? >> >> We have a project (Core Standards) where the DE names are in most cases > >> 150 char. The DE names were imported into the DHIS2 using csv without >> problems. In fact, everything (custom data entry forms, custom reports, >> pivot table) works fine and displays the full name. But when editing the >> name through the UI the changes cannot be saved if the name exceeds 150 >> char. >> >> --- >> >> Regards, >> Crizelle Nel >> >> [image: HISP_Logo_sm] >> Software Development and Information Systems >> >> >> *Health Information Systems Program (HISP) - >> SA------------------------------------------------------------------------------* >> Email: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Cell: +27 84 580 3342 >> Fax: 0866 509 502 >> Skype: crizelle_nel >> Website: http://www.hisp.org >> >> 66 Rigel Avenue North, Waterkloof Ridge >> Pretoria, 0181, South Africa >> E -25.7847787 S 28.2347984 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
