Hi Lars, thanks for taking this over. If there was an api for clearing the analytics table, which is giving back a result (unlike the one for updating the analytics tables), that would already be a sufficient solution for nightly runs. Then I could always delete the analytics tables before generating them afresh. Whatever is easier for you to implement ...
You have interesting working hours :-) Regards, Uwe > Lars Helge Øverland <[email protected]> hat am 19. Februar 2016 um 04:38 > geschrieben: > > > Hi Uwe, > > will work on this. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/dhis2/+bug/1408096 > > Short-term workaround is to go to data admin > maintenance and click Clear > analytics tables. > > regards, > > Lars > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Olav Poppe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, I can only support/confirm what Uwe is saying here - I just experieced > > the same thing this morning: deleted data for one year, ran analytics, and > > the deleted data is still displayed. > > > > Olav > > > > > > > > 18. feb. 2016 kl. 07.38 skrev Uwe Wahser <[email protected]>: > > > > Dear devs, > > > > it seems like the analytics table update does not remove data/tables of > > years, > > that are no longer valid. > > > > Since dataValues can be deleted via api in batch, it can happen that > > dataValues > > for a whole year get deleted. Of course these years should not show up in > > the > > analytics (pivot, chart etc...) any more. However, those obsolete tables > > seem to > > remain in the database after running the analytics update. Of course they > > could > > be remove manually, but this is not applicable in a nightly load scenario. > > > > I did empty the cache and checked catalina.out, but I can't find an error. > > In > > the database the dataValues table remains with only the years, that were > > not > > deleted, so the deletion obviously worked. But the obsolete analytics > > tables > > (e.g. analytics_2012) are still there and populated. You can verify in the > > attached excerpt from catalina.out: only years >= 2016 were (correctly) > > updated, > > deleted years <= 2015 remained untouched. > > > > This is quite serious as it results into wrong statistics, if not > > detected. I > > just discovered this because of a major clean-up activity - if there are > > only > > very few years affected, users might not even notice that they are > > reporting > > deleted data. > > > > Currently running on 2.22, build 21765, Standard Ubuntu 14.04 & OracleJava > > 8. > > > > Thanks for checking on that, > > > > Uwe<catalina.out.2016-02-18> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > -- > Lars Helge Øverland > Lead developer, DHIS 2 > University of Oslo > Skype: larshelgeoverland > http://www.dhis2.org <https://www.dhis2.org/> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
