Discussing with Samuel and he says the population data for 2010 is of reasonable quality. We think we can start with simply moving that data from 2010 to 2011, adding a certain growth rate. I think we can make a SQL query for this rather than creating a system function. Then we can work on improving the population data as we go.
Lars 2011/3/11 Ola Hodne Titlestad <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I noticed that the indicator values for Jan 2011 are very strange > (coverages (%) are very high e.g. when looking at Coast totals) and found > out that a lot of the population figures for 2011 are still missing. > > These should be put in as soon as possible so that the indicators, reports, > charts etc. start to make sense again. > > Not sure what figures are available, but in DHIS it is possible to put > population figures both by district and by facility, since district figures > are normally more accurate and should be used in district indicators and > upwards, while it is still very useful to have indicators by facility so > where available these should be put in as well. We then need to assign all > districts to the Population Estimates data set, as I can see right now only > the facility level has been assigned. > > I suggest we get at least all the district figures in very soon (can be > done at national level I guess) and then each district can enter their > facility estimates as soon as they have them. > > What do you think? > > Ola > ---- > > > ---------------------------------- > Ola Hodne Titlestad (Mr) > HISP > Department of Informatics > University of Oslo > > Mobile: +47 48069736 > Home address: Vetlandsvn. 95B, 0685 Oslo, Norway. Googlemaps > link<http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Vetlandsvn.+95B,+0685+Oslo,+Norway> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-kenya Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-kenya More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
