Hi,
I understand you explanation about this, but for our particular case it would 
be difficult to use incremental value as the physical summary shows the 
cumulative values, in this case we would need to look for previous physical 
sources and compare with the current one and calculate the incremental value, 
this would spend time. May be you can help me a simple javascript to perform 
that.

Cheers,
João

From: Jim Grace [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 14 May 2015 16:22
To: Joao Mazuze
Cc: dhis1-users
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-users] Surveillance rules

Thank you, Joao.

Others may be able to speak to this better than I, but validating cumulative 
data values may not be a strong use case for a DHIS 2 feature. The DHIS 2 
documentation generally advises against collecting cumulative numbers in data 
elements. See for example 
https://www.dhis2.org/doc/snapshot/en/implementer/html/dhis2_implementation_guide_en_full.html#d3287e894

Instead, it is recommended to collect only the incremental number that is added 
during a time period. This allows a single data value to be entered -- the 
count for that month -- and it can be analyzed in DHIS 2 both as a new count 
and a cumulative count through time. See for example the use of indicators to 
represent cumulative data in 
https://www.dhis2.org/doc/snapshot/en/implementer/html/dhis2_implementation_guide_en_full.html#d3287e965

Cheers,
Jim


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Joao Mazuze 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes Jim, these values are cumulative, that´s why we have to compare with 
previous period to avoid user data entry errors. We have often got  many 
problems when analysing data in our reports because of user entry errors, so we 
think this feature will solve this, comparing before post and alerting the user 
if the value entered is lower than previous one.

Cheers,
Joao

From: Jim Grace [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 14 May 2015 15:24

To: Joao Mazuze
Cc: dhis1-users
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-users] Surveillance rules

Hi Joao,

Can you say more about the semantics of what you want to compare with past 
periods? For example, are these cumulative values? What do they measure?

The reason I ask these questions is to understand better the potential 
usefulness of adding this feature to DHIS 2. If you have a compelling use case, 
and if it is consistent with the philosophy of how DHIS 2 is used, then it will 
add more weight to this feature as we compare its priority to other possible 
enhancements.

Cheers,
Jim


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Joao Mazuze 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Jim,
Of course I was trying to validate in an input form. In my own case I have a 
set of data elements that after  entered  current period  values for this data 
elements we have to compare with the respective  immediate previous period 
values as in our scenario will not make sense when user enter greater values 
for the current period when compared to previous. That’s why I tried to create 
an example on the demo site as described on my last email, but unfortunately 
did not work, even when running “validation rule analysis” after assigned to 
“validation rule group”, called   Testing.

Kind regards,
Joao

From: Jim Grace [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 14 May 2015 14:53

To: Joao Mazuze
Cc: dhis1-users
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-users] Surveillance rules

Thank you Joao.

Were you trying to use this validation rule to validate data in an input form? 
Surveillance-type rules are not designed to work this way. They are used after 
data entry to look for patterns in the data, when added to a validation rule 
group and run under "Validation Rule Analysis".

If you were trying to validate data against previous values, I would like to 
know more about your use case. Can you say more about what the data elements 
are, and how they should relate to previous periods?

Cheers,
Jim


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Joao Mazuze 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thank you Jim,
Here is the problem´s background:
We need to compare current period value from previous one (monthly period) as 
the current one it is mandatory to be greater than other. In this case on the 
demo system I made an example for Bumban MCHP org unit, comparing between March 
2015 and April 2015 for dataelement “BCG doses given (<1y)”, for any value 
applied to this dataelement the validation always passes successfully, what is 
strange, the related surveillance rule is called “testePreviousPeriod”. Our 
goal is to be able to compare those monthly periodical datavalues.

Kind regards

From: Jim Grace [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 14 May 2015 14:15
To: Joao Mazuze
Cc: dhis1-users
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-users] Surveillance rules

Hi Joao,

A surveillance-type validation rule should work as you say, comparing the 
current values of the left side with previous values of the right side. I don't 
know why you aren't seeing this behaviour.

When you create a new surveillance-type validation rule, be sure to give a 
non-zero "Sequential sample count" to compare with periods immediately 
preceding the current period, and/or a non-zero "Annual sample count" to 
compare with the same period in past years. If you choose both, it will compare 
the current data with a range of sequential periods in this year and in past 
years.

If this is not the problem, I would need some more information to understand 
better your situation. If you can reproduce the problem on the demo system 
https://apps.dhis2.org/demo/, or on another system to which I can be given 
access, that might help the most.

Cheers,
Jim


On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Joao Mazuze 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi guys,
I know that surveillance rules compare data from previous periods with the 
current one. Now I need to compare data values from the same data elements(left 
and right side), but the rule ignores the previous value and compares only the 
current value itself which doesn´t make sense as surveillance rules compare 
current values with previous ones. How can I solve this?

Kind regards,
João

Kind regards
_____________________________________
João Gabriel Mazuze
National Database Manager
Projecto CHASS-SMT
Abt Associates Inc.
Av. Marginal, 4067
Cidade de Maputo, Moçambique
Fax: (+ 258)  21486767<tel:%28%2B%20258%29%C2%A0%2021486767>
Tel:  (+ 258)  21493525<tel:%28%2B%20258%29%C2%A0%2021493525>/6/8
Cell: (+258) 82 4236279<tel:%28%2B258%29%2082%204236279>
www.chasssmt.com<http://www.chasssmt.com/>

[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: 
Description: Description: Description: Logotipo CHASS-SMT]
Somos um projecto financiado  pelo PEPFAR-II, através da USAID, para reforçar o 
Sistema de Saúde das Provincias de  Sofala, Manica e Tete. Pretendemos melhorar 
a ligação e integração do HIV  com os Cuidados Primários de Saúde e outros a 
ele relacionados em coordenação com as Direcções Provinciais de Saúde e outros 
parceiros. Através do projecto CHASS-SMT, o Governo Americano apoia o Governo 
Moçambicano na melhoria da qualidade dos Serviços de Saúde no país.



________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to     : 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.


________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.


________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.



________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to