Le lun, jui 30, 2001, à 07:41:05 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > >> My glibc is 2.2.2. > > > > This looks suspicious: > [...] > > Another possibility that got me out of a gettext mess: Remove > intl/libintl.h, make distclean, then autogen again. ...which still doesn't explain why in some situations, we build what's in intl/, do like we're going to use it, and finally don't link it in, despite $INTLLIBS having a value which looks like correct (however, there are cases where I find $INTLOBJS suspicious). Oh, and why does configure want to use the included NLS on glibc 2.2.2, which has a perfectly valid gettext implementation. -- Cyrille -- Grumpf. _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
- need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Lars Clausen
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Cyrille Chepelov
- Re: need more help compiling from CVS Andrew S . Halper