On Wednesday, 23 January, 2002 17:24, Cameron S. Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BAH> > BAH> To solve the problem of lines ending up "disconnected", perhaps you can use > BAH> the same workaround that I outlined in an answer on 2002-01-21 to > BAH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the thread "Predict the size of a UML class". > BAH> > BAH> Not a perfect solution, but it works reasonably well... > > I saw that. This is the lesser of my two problems as Dia seems to do what > you describe pretty well if I make sure the lines actually attach to the > connection points of the various objects. The only problem is that when > switching between resolutions, some objects have to be moved slightly in > order for the connection lines to remain straight (i'm anal ok?).
Hmmm... let me see if I got this one straight <g>. You want to have the lines sorta "connected" to the objects, yet don't want to actually connect them (� la "red handle"), because that makes the lines not 100 % vertical/horizontal in some cases? In that case, what about using zig-zag lines? (It's what I do at least...) > BAH> What about scaling the entire diagram down to a lower factor? This should > BAH> cause smaller fonts to be selected as well. > > My document was built scaled down to 25. Also, changing the scale doesn't > seem to do anything for me on screen WRT font size. It just makes the page > borders on the background move. Zoom? > Or just tell me to bug off if this question is beyond the scope of the > list. I think we should have plenty of room here for your questions... and it's valuable feedback after all! -+-Ben-+- _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
