On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le Mon, Mar 11, 2002, � 04:12:06PM -0600, Lars Clausen a �crit: > >> The main question now is: What do we do about Gtk 2.0 in Dia? Do we >> make a branch for the conversion? Do we use a HAVE_GTK_2_0 macro (as I >> have done so far)? Do we ignore it till it stabilizes a bit? > > I've made my opinion on the subject clear enough at several times. > > Basically, we have to cater for three targets: > * gtk > * GNOME > * gtk-win32 > > Assuming the new 2.0 releases are really of release quality, we still > miss the non-beta GNOME libs. I'd say, let's see how others shake these > for one, perhaps two months. In the mean time, let's fix what we > currently have, so that we do a last gtk 1.4 release and then jump (this > being said under the assumption that the G2 stuff is not rotten and is > going to be released in a stable state and in a timely manner).
Since the Windows versions of Gtk 2.0 are due out in a couple months, it makes sense to wait a bit. Of course, Gtk 2.0 uses utf8 all over the place, so the Unicode conversion will be much easier then. -Lars
-- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| H�rdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?
