On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Matthieu Sozeau wrote: > Le 29 Apr 2002 10:33:07 -0500, Lars Clausen a �crit: > >>> Also class member functions default to virtual - bad choice. When >>> loading my classes from 0.88.1, they come up as virtual, even though >>> they weren't in 0.88.1. >> >>Ugh. I bet some Java programmer did that:) That kind of change should >>not happen without a version update on the save file and conversion. Bad >>Cyrille! No donut! >> >>-Lars >> > > Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting the old >"abstract" attribute. This is just a matter of changing > + op->inheritance_type = UML_POLYMORPHIC; > - op->inheritance_type = UML_LEAF; > inside objects/UML/uml.c ~500
I guess Cyrille applied your patch. Problem is, now a lot of diagrams have been made with POLYMORPHIC as default. How can we tell what a missing entry is supposed to be? Are they always explicit now? -Lars -- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| H�rdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket? _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
