Le Wed, Jul 03, 2002, � 10:00:20AM -0300, Dolores Alia de Saravia a �crit:
> It was quite easy for me to write a new object by imitating
> UML/object.c y chronogram/chronoline.c
This is great news ! (wow -- imitating chronoline.c -- not for the faint of
heart)
> But I would like to understand a bit more; I use
> GINT_TO_POINTER (2), or INT_TO_POINTER (6) or INT_TO_POINTER (10)
> and there are no visible differences ...
GINT_TO_POINTER(x) is GLibese for ((void *)(x))
I guess I could be more helpful if you could point me at some context... (I
suspect it's related to the possibility to have the same underlying type
appear several times on a sheet with different defaults, eg: in the GRAFCET
sheet, Step and Initial Step are the same object, but with different
initialisation parameters. IIRC, the "variant" value is passed as a "void
*", so as we need to pass an int, we cast it using GINT_TO_POINTER (and
GPOINTER_TO_INT)).
-- Cyrille
--
Grumpf.
_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
