On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Andrew Ferrier wrote: > Those were the problems I was referring to :). I think I was > getting mixed up with my terminology: I see your point and I > think I understand. I won't worry about it too much then. I was > thinking of old-fashoned ANSI (255 chars) --- I have to admit I > have no idea how this maps onto character sets these days, > though I think what I'm thinking of basically is Latin-1. > That's the same as ISO 8859-1, right?
Yes, that's indeed the very same '-1':) > In fact, the more I think about this, the more I get confused. > I can't seem to find any good introduction/references to all > this stuff on the web. Does anyone know where I can go to learn > more about character sets etc. these days? Ick... no, not really. > I will leave the output as it is, write the AUTHORS dependency > etc., and then the bug can be closed. Sounds good. -Lars -- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| H�rdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket? _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
