On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > >> Indeed, this issue of linewidth zero is just a dead mashed horse. I made >> the deliberate choice to explicitely never issue a linewidth zero to any >> output device whatsoever; I issue a very very thin (but constant and >> mastered) width instead. The rationale is in the source, changelogs and >> in the ML archives; I see zero reason to change this behaviour. > > While a dont have any problem with this behaviour i suspect the specifics > of the implementation it might have something to do with an unwanted side > effect i have been suffering when attempting to create shapes with just a > fill but no outline. > > I think i may have mentioned this before but not explained it > particularly well.
I still don't understand this -- what is the difference between those three figures, propertywise? -Lars -- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| H�rdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket? _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
