I'm using Dia v0.90 and am running it on Mandrake Linux. I would like to know if I can transfer my dia file from Linux to a windows box and run the windows dia version to work with that file. Is this possible?
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dia-list digest, Vol 1 #751 - 6 msgs Send Dia-list mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Dia-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Paper size annoyings (Alejandro Aguilar Sierra) 2. UML state diagrams (Andrzej Wasowski) 3. Dia ChangeLog report for Wed Feb 12 08:23:02 2003 (UTC) (Dia ChangeLog Daemon) 4. Re: UML state diagrams (Christophe Ponsard) 5. Re: UML state diagrams (Alejandro Aguilar Sierra) 6. Re: UML state diagrams (Alejandro Aguilar Sierra) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:44:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: Paper size annoyings From: "Alejandro Aguilar Sierra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dia users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello: I am using dia from today cvs. The ps produced has the right paper size name and gv display it correctly, but when I print it or convert it to PDF, the problem reapears (letter -> A4). Any idea? By the way, the cvs version segfaults when I try to export (before opening the dialog), with this message: (dia:31015): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 230 (g_strconcat): assertion `string1 != NULL' failed Segmentation fault Regards. -- Alejandro Aguilar Sierra [EMAIL PROTECTED] --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:21:44 +0100 From: Andrzej Wasowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UML state diagrams Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, As you UML is being discussed my question comes not completely off topic. What about supporting statecharts in dia. Is anybody working on that? I only see a mysterious icon "create a state machine", which seems to create a state (rather than a machine). Has there been any progress there? I am willing to help (or even make it happen), but the bleeding edge requirements of current CVS scare me a bit... andrzej --__--__-- Message: 3 Subject: Dia ChangeLog report for Wed Feb 12 08:23:02 2003 (UTC) From: Dia ChangeLog Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:27:33 +0100 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Snapshots available at http://www.crans.org/~chepelov/dia/snapshots *** Recent ChangeLog entries: --- ChangeLog.previous 2003-02-11 09:24:04.000000000 +0100 +++ dia-cvs-snapshot/ChangeLog 2003-02-12 09:23:06.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2003-02-11 Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * plug-ins/svg/render_svg.c: + * lib/diasvgrenderer.c: Fixed numeric localized output issues. + 2003-02-10 Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * objects/SADT/arrow.c (sadtarrow_draw): Clamp cosa, cosb to --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:44:47 +0100 From: Christophe Ponsard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UML state diagrams Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Andrzej Wasowski wrote: > Hi, > > As you UML is being discussed my question comes not completely off > topic. What about supporting statecharts in dia. Is anybody working on > that? I only see a mysterious icon "create a state machine", which > seems to create a state (rather than a machine). Right and the icon is for a final state ;-) > I am willing to help (or even make it happen), but the bleeding edge > requirements of current CVS scare me a bit... I would also like to contribute here. About state machine a good start would be to define shapes for superstate, parallel decomposition, start and final states, reuse the existing state (for backward compatibility), transitions (with a property textfields for event [guard] / action There is also probably some work to do to get more complete support in - class diagrams (eg. nary relationships, associations classes) - activity diagrams (eg. subsystem, vertical fork/joins) etc (check against a good UML reference card or even the OMG spec) Another point which was discussed previously is about structuring sheets into some packages. With more UML shape, the sheet could become a bit overcrowded and it may become useful to split the sheet into several ones, redesign the interface to manage categories, a set of working sheets, etc... I wish I could prototype sth... As soon as I get some free time to have a try. Christophe --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:23:47 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: UML state diagrams From: "Alejandro Aguilar Sierra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > As you UML is being discussed my question comes not completely off > topic. What about supporting statecharts in dia. Is anybody working on > that? Yes, I am. > I only see a mysterious icon "create a state machine", which seems > to create a state (rather than a machine). Has there been any progress > there? Which version of dia are you using? In 0.91-pre, there are 5 separated icons for state machines: initial/final, state, activity, branch and fork/union. Regards. Alejandro -- Alejandro Aguilar Sierra [EMAIL PROTECTED] --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:36:10 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: UML state diagrams From: "Alejandro Aguilar Sierra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christophe Ponsard wrote: > Right and the icon is for a final state ;-) As I told to Andrzej, you are talking about an older version of dia. > I would also like to contribute here. About state machine a good start > would be > to define shapes for superstate, parallel decomposition, start and final > states, > reuse the existing state (for backward compatibility), Please have a look at a recent dia. > transitions (with > a property textfields for event [guard] / action Currently you can do that using a message. Let's see which further things are needed for a proper transition. > There is also probably some work to do to get more complete support in - > class diagrams (eg. nary relationships, associations classes) > - activity diagrams (eg. subsystem, vertical fork/joins) Again, see a recent dia. > With more UML shape, the sheet could become a bit overcrowded and it > may become useful > to split the sheet into several ones, redesign the interface to manage > categories, a set of working sheets, > etc... I wish I could prototype sth... As soon as I get some free time > to have a try. Agreed, that could be useful. Regards. -- Alejandro Aguilar Sierra [EMAIL PROTECTED] --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list End of Dia-list Digest _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
