On 19 Feb 2003, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

> Date: 19 Feb 2003 08:03:21 +0100
> From: Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dia-list digest, Vol 1 #758 - 5 msgs
>
> >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>  Lars> I agree that having a different extension would be nice.  Maybe
>  Lars> .diaz?  .zdia?  I prefer .zdia.
>
> Why not simply use .dia.gz ?

Firstly notice the pattern of the other filetypes i gave as examples.
And most current systems are niave enough to only see .gz and associate it
with an Archive or Compressiong program.

- Alan

_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html
Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia

Reply via email to