On 4 Mar 2003, Zhang Lin-bo wrote: >I'd like to make two comments about properties editing >in dia-0.91: > >1. Does it make sense to provide to users the ability >to specify, when editing the properties of a group >of objects, whether they want the intersection >of the sets of properties (properties common to >all objects in the group, which is the current >behaviour of dia), or the union of all properties? >I think the latter sometimes is also useful.
The latter would indeed be useful. However, the sheer number of properties involved could be overwhelming. Some clearer organization would be necessary. >2. When changing properties while several objects >are selected (but not grouped), the changes only >apply to the first object. Isn't it more reasonable >to apply changes to all objects selected? >This way people won't need to group a set of >objects only for changing some common properties >of them. This is a confusing behaviour that will be fixed in 0.92 (Big UI Upgrade version). -Lars -- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket? _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
