On 8 Sep 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Enrique Arizon Benito wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 19:27:12 +0200 >> From: Enrique Arizon Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: gtk-doc vs Doxygen results >> >> Two weeks ago I wrote asking for some particular system used for >> documenting dia source code (Doxygen or similar tool). > > This got me thinking that UML diagrams of the Dia code would be pretty > cool documentation.
I've hacked a little on that, but get distracted by easily fixable bugs every time:) > [Like as if anyone ever design the complete system in UML in advance! my > lecturer let the cat out of the bag that most projects he had known > generated the UML aftet the fact and used it largely as documentation, > but still comparing it to even a partial original design would be useful, > or it would help future restructuring.] *grin* That's interesting -- I usually use it as an informal technique on blackboards to just toss around ideas. > Has anyone ever run autodia on Dia itself? > > Granted it might not look pretty without significant layout work but it > might be interesting and form both a useful example to work from and > serve as documentation. Idon't think Autodia handles Dias ad-hoc OO code very well. -Lars -- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket? _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
