On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 10:04, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Tue, Mar 23, 2004, � 09:28:58AM +0100, Dia ChangeLog Daemon a �crit:
>
> > + * objects/standard/box.c objects/standard/ellipse.c : fix gccisms :
> > + standard C requires variables to be declared at the beginning of
> > + a block, also there is no fabsf() with msvc
>
> Naaah, Hans, this is your C compiler which doesn't conform with C99, that's
> all.
>
> More seriously, Lars, perhaps we should consider enabling a few gcc
> pedwarns, maybe to the extent of demanding C89 conformance, shouldn't we?
C89 sounds reasonable.
> (Hans is sometimes a good substitute for gcc -pedantic, but in the long run,
> gcc with suitable arguments will be more patient and help better distribute
> the portability effort)
Agreed. It is unfortunately still too early to expect C99 conformance.
I was surprised to find that {} isn't actually allowed in C, I was fully
expecting it to be a zero-element array.
-Lars
_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html
Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
