Thanks, changing the #define works! I noticed that all types of UML objects have their own hardcoded line-width (usually 0.1). Would it be worth defining it centrally so all UML objects (including aggregation arrows, etc.) would share one value?
-Rob Am Die, den 27.07.2004 schrieb Lars Clausen um 22:21: > On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 22:05, Robert Staudinger wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i've been doing a few class diagrams in dia, which i then exported to > > eps in order to include them in a latex document. > > It would be really cool if there would be a possibility to reduce the > > class-boxes', arrows' etc. border width because the diagram looks very > > "bold" after latex pdf generation. > > I've been looking into the saved .dia file, but line-width doesn't seem > > to be an explicit property of the uml shapes. > > Any possibility to get "finer" lines would really help me. Maybe there's > > even a possibility to hack (postprocess :) the eps file? > > The UML class source file defines > > #define UMLCLASS_BORDER 0.1 > > While it can be changed to be settable in the properties, the UML class > code is really fugly and I cannot advice anyone who values his or her > sanity to try to add stuff to it. > > Still haven't heard back about the PROP_LIST update that would allow us > to finally get all UML objects into stdprop format (basically, it has to > provide the list-with-properties-per-item like UML Class operations and > attributes). > > -Lars > > > _______________________________________________ > Dia-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list > FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html > Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia > _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
