the recent release notes mention running out of version numbers before Dia is ready to be declared 1.0. (I'd have called Dia 1.0 long ago, I'm not very conservative about version numbers, but that is not important). I'd point out this comment about Nano version numbers as in version Major.Minor.Micro.Nano
http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/index.php?p=203 I think there is something much more elegant restricting the version number to just numbers (makes it easier to parse if you want to check something). Of course the versioning scheme is entirely at the discretion of who ever makes the packages but it thought it better to comment onlist rather than suggest it directly. Sincerely Alan Horkan _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
