Lars Clausen wrote: > On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 00:59, Alan Horkan wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, DANIELLLANO wrote: > > > Shouldn't it be enabled by default? > > > > If you can no longer find any bugs in it maybe, > > but it has been unstable in the past. > > It has been a version or two since it was unstable.
Are the bugs reported? Are them fixed? Do you know how to reproduce them? > Real problem is that it's significantly slower, It's a default. People would still be able to chose non antialiased renderer. > and that it requires libart which is not > installed everywhere. Almost all current Linux distributions provide it. I was just suggesting on having it enabled by default, if there's no libart just fall back to the non antialiased renderer. > > I actually kind of like the sharper edges of non-anti-aliased drawings > > (makes for better PNG files) and I'm not sure it makes much difference on > > an LCD screen anyway. > > I frequently turn it on on LCD screens. In particular, it makes > arrowheads much nicer. I try to have everything antialiased. _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
