After I posted my msg http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2004-September/msg00031.html I found the related messages http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2004-September/msg00000.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2004-September/msg00002.html
Unless these experiences are known anomalies, perhaps the Windows download page http://dia-installer.sourceforge.net/ should warn XP users and suggest 0.92 instead. This is really useful software, and IMHO you should make sure that Windows users who are increasingly interested in open source software are likely to have an excellent experience. fwiw, Alan Isaac PS I've been using 0.90 under XP with good results and 0.92 under Win2000 with good results, and my students who got rid of 0.94 and are using 0.92 are now having a good experience. _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
