On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 21:32 +0200, Joachim Otahal wrote: > 2nd try, this time correct subject line..... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > From: "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Rotating 45?/90? > > > It's not a problem in the underlying rendering libraries, and hasn't been > > for a while. It's a problem of integrating it in Dia:<vut> > > > > -Lars > > > I know this reason already, my older question is still somewhere in the > DIA list I suppose. Would modifying (hacking ?) the > Obiject-to-be-rotated to be it's turned representative work? Do not > store the object rotation, store the rotated object and the renderer > doesn't have to be changed (I know, supposed-to-be-ugly style). > 45 is probably impossible without side effects since doing 8*45 turn > doesn't mean we are back at the way the original object was (rounding > problem), but 4*90 gives you back the original. And IF turning, don't > forget the connector points the lines go to, I tend to give all holes of > a networkswitch it's own connector point when doing my own objects.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're suggesting. My thoughts run towards storing rotation (or even a full affine transformation matrix) with each object and let them cache rotated values of their points. -Lars _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
