Hi (again), Sorry for the horrible english, I should have reread it before hitting send.
I just discovered that it looks (visually) a bit like adding a Class object to a Large Package in UML. When resizing the package shape, the contained class shape doesn't resize/rescale. -- dpy 2007/10/19, Marcel Toele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I just discovered, > > it looks (visually) a bit adding a Class object to a Large Package in UML. > When resizing the package shape, the contained class shape doesn't > resize/rescale. > > -- > dpy > > 2007/10/19, Marcel Toele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Yes, thought of things like that. > > > > I'd like to have percentages, points, other units. > > > > Also I think it would be useful to have ctrl+resize-dragging do uniform > > resize in addition to the (to be) normal operation for shapes that contain > > these "subshapes", in which case the resize-dragging would be applied > > non-uniformly, as described in the previous post. > > > > This way, the end-user can bail-out or override the subshape behaviour > > for the current diagram. > > > > -- > > dpy > > > > 2007/10/19, W. Martin Borgert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:06:36PM +0200, Marcel Toele wrote: > > > > or not at all, when the parent is resized). This implies, that a > > > sub-shape > > > > is anchored somewhere in the parent. > > > > > > It would be nice, if this anchor point could not only be fixed > > > (such as "top-left" of the parent), but also relative to the > > > parent, e.g. "5% below top of parent, 10% of parent size from > > > parents left border". > > > > > > Anyway, your planned change is welcomed warmly! > > > > > > Cheers, Martin > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
