On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 09:39 +0100, Marcel Toele wrote: > 2007/12/4, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Actually, it's not a bug in the SVG path code. The bottom-left > sub-shape > does not have an outline, it consists of fill-only. But, as I have > stated > previously, the default value for "filling dia objects" has been > changed > from true to false. This means that from now on, no shape will be > filled > by default. As I also said before: this may be a big problem, because > many (if not all) custom shapes depend on this attribute to default to > true (if they are to appear according to their icon).
Yes, that's definitely an issue. Could you make a bug report on it? > > I'll look into it and will come back to you on the default_scale > issue, which > as you states, perhaps should be fixed outside the scope of > sub-shapes, > or in combination with a default shape size of other shapes. > > Can you point me to the bugreport you are referring to. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451006 > Am I right to think that there is no such thing as a > sub-sub-shape? > When I try, the sub-sub-shape appears, but not different from > when it's > a sub-shape. > > Theoretically it should be possible to have sub-sub-shapes and > recurse > to infinity, however, I have intentionally opted not to do this, as > this will > be very confusing to end-users. It will also create a big > user-interaction > problem: "How to resize the sub-sub-shapes or the sub-[sub]*-shapes?" I agree there are some ... interesting UI problems there. -Lars _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
