Quoting "Lars Ræder Clausen" <[email protected]>:
I have pondered dumping an SVG representation of each shape into
the .dia file, mainly for allowing rendering without having to
reimplement e.g. the UML classes.

This sounds like a very good idea! Esp. if people use some custom
shapes or sth. from the shapes repository they never can be sure
whether co-workers have the same stuff installed.

It would also make free the way to remove objects or shapes from
dia in the long run (e.g. if they are in a bad state and
unmaintained), without leaving users with unrepresentable files.

It does open some IP issues, such as
whether the SVG rendering of a GPLed shape can be used in a non-GPL
program.

Maybe the authors of current shapes and objects would have to
agree, that the SVG representation be used for diagrammes under
public domain. I would probably agree for "my" objects and shapes
(some UML, some network, all renewable energy).

_______________________________________________
dia-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia

Reply via email to