At 18.06.2009 11:26, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to sort out a bug [1] in Parse-Dia-SQL which seem to be triggered by
UML Association file format changes in Dia version 0.97. I wonder if similar changes
can be expected going forward,
Yes, changes to Dia's native format internals are to be expected in the
future, though they usually try to keep even forward-compatibility. See
e.g.: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576468
and if yes, can the "version" tag be used to identify them?
Yes, the 0.96 Association had version="1", for 0-97 it is version="2".
Or am I missing something?
I have also noticed that multiplicity is spelled 'multipicity' in objects/UML/association.c.
Is that intentional or a typo?
An unfortunate typo now part of the specification (answer a bit hard to be
found by google suggesting the right spelling) at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/ here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2009-March/msg00067.html
Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
_______________________________________________
dia-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
