On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:58:14 +0100 > From: Hans Breuer <[email protected]> > > At 11.11.2010 15:39, niklas | brueckenschlaeger wrote: >> and the rendering information, >> which is exactly what I need, but the DTD doesn't say anything about >> properties / attributes. Is that valid? > This is boon and bane of how property serialization implmentation is no > central management of property details, but every object plug-in can extend > the format specification with it's needs. > Manually maintaining a DTD does not look reasonable to me and up until now > I never got around to autonmatically generate is with a dedicated plug-in. ...... > Yeah, intentionally. The format is not finalized or released so the DTD > will change without notice or compatibility concerns.
Is there some reason a DTD is needed? I do recall that the W3C SVG working group decided to not issue a DTD for SVG. As I recall, their reasoning can be summarised as "the DTD would be extremely complex". As far as I know, SVG gets along quite well without a DTD. _______________________________________________ dia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
